Should we be using palo santo?

growing

April 9, 2019

Alisha Galbraith

Should we be using palo santo?

I did a lot of reading before I started looking for an alternative to smudging with sage–one, because I just don’t love the smell of wild sage and two, to be frank, because all of the controversy around white people using a plant that is sacred to many indigenous cultures.

While reading I found palo santo, or holy wood. This seemed like a really beautiful alternative to white sage, which is actually not endangered as many posts on the internet suggest, I do feel like it isn’t being treated with respect. You can check to see if a list is on the endangered list by checking the USDA database here.

Anyway, back to palo santo: when I learned about palo santo over a year ago I read that it is harvested from naturally dead trees or limbs making this a sustainable alternative to white sage. To have the greatest effect, sticks should be made from trees that have been dead at least 4-10 years. So I was like, awesome, and I got some and I’ve been using it ever since. Not like every day, but once every week and a half or so. Or sometimes only once a month. It really just depends. Since the tree is related to frankincense and myrrh, it makes all the sense in the world why it it one of my favorites.

Now fast forward to a year+ later I’ve been seeing posts sharing concerns over people using palo santo–and I’ve had a few different friends send me these posts and we’ve had some good discussion! I’ll share some of the concerns and my thoughts here 🙂

disclaimer: this is not meant to dismiss, hurt, guilt, or shame anyone, but to share my perspective. like, I’m afraid to even post pictures of my palo santo right now haha

Concern: Palo Santo is endangered and not ethically harvested

When I read this I was like, OMG I thought I read through the internet thoroughly on this!! And my heart fell out of my body for a minute. And while this is true for some areas, it is not true for all areas. Palo Santo is endangered in Peru (report hasn’t been updated since 2005 source). But Palo Santo also grows in Ecuador, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Galapagos. So Palo Santo is not endangered in all of these areas, though “In some of the regions that it is grown, because of its cultural significance, the tree is protected by the government and can only be harvested from deadfall and dead trees.” (source).

For example: juniper berry is considered an endangered tree in Europe, but here in the United States our trees aren’t. (source)

And even then it’s only certain types of this tree–if you look at the botanical name of palo santo, you’ll see that it is Bursera graveolens, whereas this report is for PAO Santo, not PALO santo (source) so I’m wondering if there is some confusion regarding the two trees?

It’s important to note that the endangerment of Palo Santo is not solely from the trend of people using it for cleansing though it has certainly brought it to light–it has also been used for flooring, furniture, crafts, perfume, and essential oil. (source.)

Concern: using Palo Santo is cultural appropriation

I will be 100% honest, cultural appropriation is hard for me to understand because I come from such a mixed heritage–I’ve never felt like I completely “fit” into one culture; I’m either too much of one thing or not enough of another, so I’ve always just pulled things I like from different cultures, even if they weren’t my “own”.

But I still try to be mindful of appropriation. This one time we went to spend Thanksgiving in the Smoky Mountains in North Carolina. We spent the day after Thanksgiving hiking, then stopped in the Cherokee reservation to check out a couple of the shops. I remember my husband parking the car and I told him to wait because I needed to take out my braid before we went into the shop. He was so confused as to why, but as a darker skinned person who is kind of culturally ambiguous and has been mistaken for “Native American” and “Cherokee” and “Navajo” and “Ute” before, especially when I wear a braid, I didn’t want to accidentally portray a false image. He was still so confused and let’s be honest, my people also come from Denmark and they wear braids too, but…there I was, taking out my braid so no one thought I was trying to appropriate.

I don’t have a black and white answer to this concern and because I don’t it seems dismissive, though I don’t intend it to be. But I also believe that people cannot decide who can and cannot use a plant (which is why the government and cannabis piss me off so much and of course, being safe with a plant is always ideal). I definitely believe it is important to understand that all plants, no matter what they are, have life and are sacred. That it’s important to understand the cultural significance behind what you are using. Saying that people can’t use certain plants because they aren’t of that culture seems…trivial.

How can we possibly come together if we’re fighting about plants?

Concern: You can only use palo santo when given to you by a shaman

Unpopular opinion: While I do believe that shaman are holy and wise, I don’t subscribe to the idea that you can only use certain plants unless a holy man gives it to you. The Earth has already given these plants to all of us–they are a GIFT already. We are born with a natural stewardship to the earth and these plants. Plants have both practical and spiritual uses and can be used religiously/ceremoniously or socially (like the Hawaiian drink, kava, or corn and quinoa–if you really want to get upset let’s look at the desecration of corn through GMO, plz). Obviously when a trend is taking place it is considered social, but can become spiritual when one incorporates it into their spiritual practice.

Concern: Palo Santo means nothing when a western civilization uses it so you’re just wasting it

I feel like this again, goes back to the social vs spiritual use of palo santo. Some people may literally be burning it because they think it’s cool and everyone else is doing it, sharing it on social media (as I have done) as a social/educational aspect. But just because a western human is using it doesn’t mean they’re using it brainlessly. If you choose to use it, use it mindfully! Set an intention, read stories and learn about how it was used. This is another good source.

I’m not going to tell you not to buy palo santo. I’m not going to tell you to buy it either. It’s up to you. Ask yourself why you want it, what will you use it for, then if you choose to buy it, make sure you have ethically sourced palo santo (because it is possible). Feel free to have a civil discussion in the comments ♥

Update: Comment from Fabrizio Vera: we greet you from the company EcuadorianHands. We have read your website, and we are very interested in the subject of palo santo. We are aware of current concerns in social media about the future of the Palo Santo Bursera Graveolens tree and its “danger of extinction”. We have been working for around 5 years in restoring the dry forests of Manabí and make the Palo Santo sustainable. In this year only we reforested around 4000 trees of palo santo. We would like you to please learn about our work to preserve this sacred wood and can be an useul source of information. With respect. https://www.ecuadorianhands.com/en/blog/372_is-palo-santo-really-endangered.html

  1. joseph

    April 15th, 2019 at 2:19 am

    I loved your honesty! This topic can mean something else to each person. Thank you for sharing. // xoxo, imacocoageek

  2. Fabrizio Vera

    June 26th, 2019 at 5:40 pm

    we greet you from the company EcuadorianHands. We have read your website, and we are very interested in the subject of palo santo. We are aware of current concerns in social media about the future of the Palo Santo Bursera Graveolens tree and its "danger of extinction". We have been working for around 5 years in restoring the dry forests of Manabí and make the Palo Santo sustainable. In this year only we reforested around 4000 trees of palo santo. We would like you to please learn about our work to preserve this sacred wood and can be an useul source of information. With respect. https://www.ecuadorianhands.com/en/blog/372_is-palo-santo-really-endangered.html

  3. Christina

    July 26th, 2019 at 9:05 pm

    I read your article and there are some things in question to your blog post and the information you share as reference points. You listed the USDA as a reference point for researching endangered, threatened, at risk, rare, vulnerable plants which is the United States Department of Agriculture site (USDA), This site is only for plants of the United States and not plants worldwide. So you listed a reference for research that would not show Palo Santo because it is not native to the states so listing a site like USDA is not going to help your readers do the proper research. I am not sure if you were aware of what the USDA was or how it is used or how a plant is assessed for its status . The species most used in commerce is Bursera graveolens which is listed as Critically Endangered is in fact impacted by not only the over harvesting but as well as climate change. You defend your use of Palo Santo by listing other regions aside of Ecuador in which it is endemic, by saying it is not in threat in those regions, you may not be aware of the assessment tools used to verify status of a plant. You also list a source for info to defend that because the plant grows outside of Ecuador then this means that it is not impacted or endangered in other regions of which it is native to, I looked up the source you listed which is a company who sells Palo Santo so of course they are going to be defensive.

    Point is, the Plant Lust that we as humans have created is impacting the plants, let’s educate ourselves and defer the plant lust, there are many other plants that we can use that are not impacted, rare, vulnerable, threatened, endangered or on the "to watch list". We see this with the use of White Sage, another plant that is heavily impacted by folks demand. Companies claim to be "sustainability" harvesting the plant but everyone is using that as a catch phrase. As consumers and folks who work with plants, it is our responsibility to respect them and do our research. Find a legit source who is truly gathering the plant in true sustainable practice and don’t buy it off amazon, urban outfitters, the local health food stores, websites that write phony blogs defending their use and sales or metaphysical shops. Educate sellers of the plants status and others. Give the plant a break.

    You defend your use of a plant that is endangered by saying it grows in other parts of South America and say it is not endangered there. When in fact the plant is in fact endangered it is also being over harvested and poached in all regions in which it is endemic along with climate change has impacted the tree. When you purchase Palo Santo does it come with the information of where it was sourced? How could you be confident in that your Palo Santo was from what region or how it was harvested.

    Your article deems more harm than protection of a plant. I hope your readers do the responsible thing and do research. You brought up cultural appropriation well, aside of that how about many of these "sacred" plants that get exploited by the main stream are plants that Indigenous People use and is part of their culture and medicine for a millennia. The continuance of denial and lack of responsibility is not only impacting plants but stealing the very medicine and cultural use of people indigenous to where the plant is endemic.

    Just some food for thought.

    HERE IS AN ARTICLE FROM THE UNITED PLANT SAVERS which list that Palo Santo is CRITICALLY ENDANGERED. https://unitedplantsavers.org/essential-and-carrier-oil-bearing-plants-conservation-consciousness/

    For information on plants status refer to the USDA within the U.S https://plants.usda.gov/threat.html

    United Plant Savers list plants used in commerce that are in threat or to watch or in review. https://unitedplantsavers.org/species-at-risk-list/

    Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). http://www.cites.org

    International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). http://www.redlist.org

  4. Alisha Galbraith

    July 27th, 2019 at 9:01 pm

    I sense that you’re frustrated and I appreciate your resources so readers can look further than my post. Again, my post was to share my perspective on appropriation as well as encourage readers to do further research of palo santo on their own. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

  5. Fabrizio Vera

    September 9th, 2019 at 9:56 pm

    Cristina, I’ve read your comments.

    We are working with palo santo Bursera Graveolens for over 15 years, and we have never seen anybody of those blogs conducting any studies here in Manabi, Ecuador. This is our experience.

    Nevertheless, we focus on what we control. We are working in reforesting and restoring as much as possible the dry forest of Manabi where palo santo grows. Or government (ministry of environment of Ecuador) and the University of Manabi (UTM) are coworking with us on this sustainable project. We will soon publish scientific indexed documents about this sacred wood (They are almost non-existent).

    YOu can learn more, even use your google map
    https://www.ecuadorianhands.com/en/blog/31-reforestation-palo-santo-bursera-graveolens

    Thank you for your time,

    With respect,
    Fabrizio
    EcuadorianHands.com

  6. Ways clear your energy - Where She Grows

    December 26th, 2019 at 4:46 pm

    […] space and I fully believe that you can use whatever plant you want. I wrote about this a bit on my post about palo santo, but I’ll include what I wrote here as […]

  7. DIY Energy Cleansing Ritual Kit - Where She Grows

    January 13th, 2020 at 7:42 pm

    […] Try learning about plants in your area or from your ancestral heritage! You can read what I think about the cultural appropriation of plants here.  […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

where she grows

other places

Contact

Blog

guides

poetry

About

Home